W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > August 2001

Re: attrsetvaluenomodificationallowederr.xml

From: Mary Brady <mbrady@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:07:33 -0400
Message-ID: <011801c129a2$fc16fbd0$293b0681@HAPPY>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>, "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
We did add two more test cases as a result
of DOM Level 1, Second Edition:


There were other changes, but just in wording for
the test purposes -- we already had tests that covered
these conditions.

I too would think that we would want the DOM Level 1
Test Suite to support Second Edition -- Is it really still
a Working Draft, as it states on the Technical Reports
Web Page?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: attrsetvaluenomodificationallowederr.xml

> >2) The DTD and schema building process could use the Second Edition
> working draft
> > instead of the original recommendation.
> That's what I'd recommend. The whole point of releasing the Second Edition
> was to correct known errata, and the testcases should incorporate those
> corrections rather than perpetuating acknowledged mistakes in the first
> release.
> >DOM Level 1 is still a working draft
> ....I presume you mean "the testcase suite for DOM Level 1"...  and for
> that very reason I would recommend correcting this now while things are
> still maximally flexible, rather than waiting and having people rediscover
> the problem when the change occurs.
> ______________________________________
> Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Received on Monday, 20 August 2001 14:09:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:03 UTC