W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > August 2001

SV: [General] Status?

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 19:57:41 +0200
Message-ID: <9F67DC27F4CCD311ABA600508B6A66A44A6BAB@VXOIMP1>
To: "'Fred L. Drake, Jr.'" <fdrake@acm.org>, "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Cc: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
One reason to avoid 8.3 is the test's names as they currently stand, take a
look at the NIST matrix...

Perhaps x.3 is a better way to go if we want to avoid long suffixes.

.domtest would also work, so that's mainly a design issue. I'd go for .tst
personally.

/Dimitris

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Fred L. Drake, Jr. [mailto:fdrake@acm.org]
Skickat: den 10 augusti 2001 20:08
Till: Arnold, Curt
Kopia: 'www-dom-ts@w3.org'
Ämne: RE: [General] Status?



Arnold, Curt writes:
 > They could be in the same directory as long as we use a distinct
 > extension for test definitions.  If they are all .xml files, then
 > ANT can't determine which files are test definitions and should be
 > validated or transformed and which are test resources.

  I'm not sure I understand just what the limitation is.  I'll have to
dig into Ant a little more to figure it out.

 > How about .tst for test definitions?

  Ugh.

 > If we decide otherwise, we can add the log elements at any time.
 > I'll put that one on hold.  However, leveraging the CVS log is
 > definitely a better approach than trying to put the equivalent log
 > explicitly in the test.

  Fine.  Agreed that the log should be maintained in CVS rather than
doing it manually.

Arnold, Curt writes:
 > Or I could stop thinking 8.3, how about .domtest?

  Could, but there's probably no specific reason to avoid 8.3, either.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
Received on Sunday, 12 August 2001 13:58:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:03 UTC