RE: Should the meaning of properties change dependent on structure? (was CC/PP components) from Art.Barstow@nokia.com on 2003-04-15 (www-di@w3.org from April 2003)

From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:53:10 -0400
To: <Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-di@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296A0169C08E@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>

Hi Mark,

> From: ext Butler, Mark [mailto:Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
...

> 1. Is it better to have properties change their meaning 
> dependent on where
> they are in a profile structure 
...

> Art Barstow has suggested that if CC/PP should allow approach 
> 1 and if it
> does not then it is broken.

This is a gross mis-representation of what I said:

> > If CC/PP does not permit an Attribute (e.g. ExpirationDate) to
> > be in different Components (i.e. CreditCard and Session) then
> > it seems to me that CC/PP is broken.  (RDF itself certainly does not
> > care.)

Regards,

Art Barstow
---

Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 17:54:13 UTC