W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2017

Re: Transition Request: WebDriver to Candidate Recommendation

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:28:14 +0900
To: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, Simon Stewart <shs@rocketpoweredjetpants.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <20170316122814.cewy5gpflb5aa2eh@sideshowbarker.net>
Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, 2017-03-13 07:54 -0400:
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/8b4b7e4a-5b96-0a94-a29b-818e755f7e0d@w3.org>
> On 3/12/2017 3:39 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> > I’ve added to the draft the following explicit statement of CR exit criteria:
> > 
> > >  This specification’s CR exit criteria are that, before requesting
> > >  transition to PR/Rec, the group will, through a (yet to be developed)
> > >  implementation report, demonstrate adequate implementation experience
> > >  for the specification.
> 
> That's a little vague. What would qualify as enough adequate implementation
> experience?

I’ve changed it to say this:

> This Candidate Recommendation will have met its CR exit criteria when there
> are at least two interoperable implementations of each feature in the spec, as
> demonstrated in a (yet to be developed) implementation report.

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith https://sideshowbarker.net/

Received on Thursday, 16 March 2017 12:29:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 16 March 2017 12:29:16 UTC