W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2015

Re: Defining exotic objects in IDL, HTML, or both?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:35:22 -0400
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <561BE14A.3050006@mit.edu>
On 10/12/15 10:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> The other benefit would be having only one specification being
> responsible for the translation to ECMAScript

We're not there anyway; consider the various specs using object/any and 
defining custom processing.

> We would likely still need IDL to define these as IDL types somehow so
> they can be used in IDL blocks.

Hmm.  Would we?  Why?  With the possible exception of same-origin 
WindowProxy, of course.

-Boris
Received on Monday, 12 October 2015 16:35:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 12 October 2015 16:35:55 UTC