W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2015

Re: Fetch & Streams meeting

From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 16:51:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJZRrJ9xJs9V39gy4uisdiN4FTZhqkNNUY7kSF34kAi4+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>, Ben Kelly <bkelly@mozilla.com>, Jake Archibald <jakearchibald@google.com>
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Given those topics, it seems like the discussions could be included
> directly
> > in WebApps' meeting. Currently, there are plenty of open slots on Monday
> and
> > I'd be happy to add these topics at time slots that are convenient for
> you
> > <
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/October2015Meeting#Agenda_Monday_October_26
> >.
> > WDYT?
>
> I think that might be too large of a group, but probably acceptable as
> long as we don't discuss anything non-technical and that is enforced
> by the chairs. It's a bit hard to say. If it's sixty people and we
> only need the attention of around five, it might end up being a
> gigantic waste of time for fifty-five people. And potentially of those
> five, if the fifty-five try to chime in without having informed
> themselves. So I guess another requirement would be that everyone that
> wants to take part in the discussion needs to have read the relevant
> documents.
>

Yeah, having a smaller break out session (people listed in To/Cc + any one
who want to join) would be better as we're likely to discuss some technical
details. Also in the main WG, Fetch/Streams could be discussed in the way
Anne described above.
Received on Friday, 9 October 2015 07:53:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 9 October 2015 07:53:15 UTC