- From: Nigel Megitt via WBS Mailer <sysbot+wbs@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:09:01 +0000
- To: nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk,www-archive@w3.org
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'TR Design Survey' (public) for Nigel Megitt. > > --------------------------------- > Group > ---- > > On behalf of which W3C Working Group are you answering this survey? > > > Timed Text Working Group > > > --------------------------------- > Sample(s) > ---- > Paste in URLs to a representative sample (1-3 links) of your specs. If > styling differs substantially between /TR and your editor's drafts, > please link to both versions. > > WebVTT: Editor draft: http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/ FPWD: http://www.w3.org/TR/webvtt1/ IMSC: http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/ (styling the same on ED and /TR) TTML: http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml1/ (styling the same on ED and /TR) > > > --------------------------------- > Specification Processor(s) > ---- > What spec pre-processor(s) does your WG use? > > ReSpec XMLSpec > > > --------------------------------- > Group style sheet(s) > ---- > Paste in URLs to any WG-specific style sheets you use. > > See https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/blob/master/webvtt.html and http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml1/ <style> element, generated from https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/file/tip/ttml1/spec/xmlspec-ttml1.xsl > > > --------------------------------- > Like > ---- > What do you like about your current styles? > > * IDL styles * example styles * todo section handling * table handling * bug registration box at top right > > > --------------------------------- > Dislike > ---- > What do you dislike about your current styles? > > That we had to make changes to ReSpec template. > > > --------------------------------- > Complex style > ---- > Paste in URLs to any parts of your spec that are stylistically complex or > tricky, and we should therefore be careful not to screw up. > > We can probably adjust to changes. > > > --------------------------------- > Table style > ---- > The new styles will include rules for rendering data tables. These will > be opt-in by class name, and rely heavily on good markup (use of THEAD, > TBODY, COLGROUP, scope attributes, etc.). See Simple Example, Less Simple > Example, and Extra-Complex Example. Paste in URLs to a sampling of any > data tables you are using so that we can try to accommodate those in the > styling, if practical. > > https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/blob/master/webvtt.html#L3578 http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1/#common-features http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml1/#vocabulary-namespaces > > > --------------------------------- > CSS WG Style > ---- > The CSSWG has made a number of minor improvements to the existing spec > styles, which we might just adopt wholesale. Please comment on what you > like/dislike about these styles, as demonstrated in the CSS3 Text > specification. > > Likes: * cleaner * links on sections * example styling * syntax highlighting * test marker box Dislike: * the test markers sit in the document a little randomly > > > --------------------------------- > Anything else? > ---- > > Is there anything else we should consider? > > > N/A > > These answers were last modified on 5 June 2015 at 13:08:31 U.T.C. > by Nigel Megitt > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/tr-design-survey-2015/ until 2015-07-07. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 5 June 2015 13:09:04 UTC