W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Comments on cepc, pwe and conf-code [Was: ... ]

From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:58 -0400
Message-ID: <542821F6.9020408@w3.org>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>

On 9/28/2014 8:22 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> [ +Bcc: ab @ w3.org ]
>
> Re:
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe#Procedures
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/conf-code
>
> * [1] needs a "Status: ..." type statement like [3] has in its 
> boilerplate.
>
> * [1] and [3] should explicitly state in their boilerplate that 
> comments and change requests are welcome and include a publicly 
> archived list for the comments and diffs.
>
> * [2] include the status of the TF and if it is still active, how one 
> can join. I also think the TF's participant list shouldn't be hidden 
> behind Member confidentiality.
>
> * [2] asking to send comments to a private list seems inconsistent 
> with literally creating a `positive work environment`. As such this 
> doc should also include a public list for comments and change requests.

In [2] we assure that people can ask questions to a private list. For 
example, an individual might feel that they were disrespected and might 
want to confidentially ask a question.

Would it be OK if we both had a public list for public comments and a 
private list for those who wanted to make private inquiries?

>
> * [1], [3] add these as new components to one of the consortium's 
> Public Bug/Issue Tracker systems such as 
> <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/> and include a link to 
> the tracker in the document's boilerplate.
>
>
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 14:58:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:33 UTC