W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2014

Re: PubReq: new WD of Shadow DOM on June 12

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:58:58 -0400
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, webreq@w3.org, team-webapps@w3.org, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>, Xiaoqian Cindy Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DB8781B6-5288-49EF-A627-41BA3A1B4511@w3.org>
To: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>

On Jun 11, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org> wrote:

> [+Ian]
> 
> Ian,
> 
> Could you give us a pointer to the decision explaining the approved wording please?

This thread in April is an attempt to build support for updated pubrules and best practices:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2014AprJun/0001

I have not had time to return to that thread but should have time now that we are past the AC meeting.

Ian

> 
> Meanwhile, Art, I suggest changing the document to include the approved wording. Doing so (and keeping the discussion open) will ensure the document can be published tomorrow.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jérémie
> 
> On 10/06/14 14:14, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> It seems to me the essence of the two text blocks is effectively the same. I think it would be helpful, if, for each of the four sentences, you
>> identified the specific part(s) that is not acceptable (and cite the document that shows why WebApps text is not acceptable). Would you please
>> do this?
>> 
>> -Thanks, Art
>> 
>> On 6/10/14 2:07 PM, Jérémie Astori wrote:
>>> Hi Yves and Art,
>>> 
>>> This document cannot be published as is because of the bottom overlay saying:
>>> 
>>>    This Version of this Document Is Obsolete and Has Been Replaced
>>>    This version of the specification is obsolete and has been replaced by the document at http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/. Do
>>> not attempt to implement this version of the specification. Do not refer to this version except as a historical artifact.
>>> 
>>> For wording, you can use the approved text that can be found on the appmanifest specification [1]:
>>> 
>>>    THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS!
>>>    This specification is for review and not for implementation! For the latest updates, including important bug fixes, please look at the
>>> draft on GitHub instead.
>>> 
>>> Let me know if you have any question.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Jérémie
>>> 
>>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-appmanifest-20131217/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10/06/14 11:01, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Jérémie Astori wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> [+Yves, +Xiaoqian]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yves or Xiaoqian,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could you install the document in TR please?
>>>> 
>>>> Done,
>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/06/14 09:35, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>>>>> WebApps would like to publish a new WD of the (standalone) Shadow DOM spec on June 12:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/publish/shadow/WD-shadow-dom-20140612/>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> OK?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Thanks, AB
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 13:59:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:31 UTC