- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:56:37 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Gregg Reynolds <dev@mobileink.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 09/24/2013 05:32 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 24 September 2013 19:15, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> So let's go back to that. Give me an example that shows three things: the
>> triples happen to be the same, the metadata must remain distinct, and there
>> is no change over time. As I think about it now, I'm beginning to think
>> it's impossible.
> How about any difference of opinion on factual matters, e.g. birther
> conspiracy theorists might believe: obama placeOfBirth kenya. Others
> might not and each could cite URLs in support of their viewpoint?
I don't see how this would meet my criteria and motivate distinct
"graphs" without involving change-over-time.
I'd address the use case like this:
GRAPH :g1 { :Obama :placeOfBirth :Kenya }
GRAPH :g2 { :Obama :placeOfBirth :Hawaii }
:Trump :believes :g1.
:Biden :believes :g2.
and I guess we can meet my first criterion by adding....
GRAPH :g3 { :Obama :placeOfBirth :Hawaii }
:Romney :believes :g2.
So we have three "graphs", two with the same triples. (Criterion 1
met.) We have no change over time (alas! :-). (Criterion 3 met.)
But are there any properties you could sensibly put on :g2 that wouldn't
also apply to :g3? I can't think of any.
-- Sandro
> Dan
>
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2013 02:56:46 UTC