W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2013

Re: EME is in the scope of the HTML WG

From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:03:58 -0400
Cc: Catherine Roy <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>, Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com>, Paul Cotton <paul.cotton@microsoft.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, www-archive Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BD46D78D-D024-4CD1-8745-41141D686575@la-grange.net>
To: Eric Whyne <ericwhyne@gmail.com>
bcc: public-html-admin
cc: www-archive 
reply-to: www-archive.
Le 30 sept. 2013 à 06:45, Eric Whyne a écrit :
> 
> If I were a content provider I'd stay far away from it.

We all understand more or less the issues of DRM. We all have an opinion about it (for and against). This doesn't solve anything and it is missing the real target. The way to fight the DRM is to propose a better business model, more attractive for **content owners**. Content providers will apply what suit the content owners.

The issue is that the content owners which are represented in W3C are not really the business people and lawyer, which are the ones you need to convince. But you can start with the Members list [1]


[1]: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List


PS: In this email, I'm not advocating for or against DRM. My personal opinion is against DRM. That doesn't make a solution.

-- 
Karl Dubost
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/


Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 13:04:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:26 UTC