- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:05:35 +0000
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Have we come to a conclusion on this? > > We need to decide to let people go through the staging process. > > I'm in favor of prov:has_provenance . As this is a purely syntactic change > from what we already had. OK, you have my +1 at least, given GKs concern over almost looking like a class name which I had not thought about. We should settle this soon! GK, I guess you would be updating the PAQ drafts as well. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 10:06:23 UTC