W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2013

Re: hasProvenance property name [MAYBE URGENT]

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:05:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXt=G4UZFMWVgYi_kW9O5j=obd9__FKF7Vfys4zcGvg_g1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
> Have we come to a conclusion on this?
> We need to decide to let people go through the staging process.
> I'm in favor of prov:has_provenance . As this is a purely syntactic change
> from what we already had.

OK, you have my +1 at least, given GKs concern over almost looking
like a class name which I had not thought about.

We should settle this soon!  GK, I guess you would be updating the PAQ
drafts as well.

Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 10:06:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:44:17 UTC