W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2013

Re: UI Events question

From: Кошмарчик <garykac@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:22:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGnkXoF0Ou+yRwrHFWMaHZZC3J939wAJiUzzZ+NZhc+ytALLQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
The "Latest published version" link is still doesn't do the right thing.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Travis Leithead <
travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  Looks like Gary beat me to fixing the links. Thanks!****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Travis Leithead
> *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2013 10:07 AM
> *To:* 'Gary Kačmarčík (Кошмарчик)'; Anne van Kesteren
> *Cc:* www-archive
> *Subject:* RE: UI Events question****
>
> ** **
>
> Oops. I can adjust those auto-generated links...****
>
> ** **
>
> On DOM3... As Gary mentioned, we're focusing on the new stuff in UI
> Events. There was a lot of legacy prose that probably doesn't need to carry
> forward, especially given that most of the raw event model stuff is in
> DOM4. I suppose as we add/adjust functionality from the other UI Events,
> they will be added in as needed. We may need a more coherent story than
> this for FPWD, but for now, this is working OK.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Gary Kačmarčík (Кошмарчик) [mailto:garykac@google.com<garykac@google.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2013 5:57 AM
> *To:* Anne van Kesteren
> *Cc:* Travis Leithead; www-archive
> *Subject:* Re: UI Events question****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
> wrote:****
>
> Hey,
>
> The links in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/d4e/raw-file/tip/source_respec.htm
> 404. I was planning to link to this specification from DOM, but I'm
> not sure where to point now.****
>
>  ** **
>
> The rename from "d4e" -> "uievents" seems to have broken the
> auto-generated links at the top.  It looks like we'll have to move the
> repository from hg/d4e to hg/uievents, but perhaps Travis knows a more
> clever way of resolving this.****
>
>  ****
>
> Also, will this specification include all
> the prose from DOM Level 3 Events that's not superseded by DOM? That's
> the plan right?****
>
>  ** **
>
> At the moment, we're focusing on new content, but I'm not against merging
> the DOM3 content.****
>
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 18:23:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 February 2013 18:23:21 GMT