W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Draft: Plan and next steps for AppCache.NG

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:35:50 +0100
To: "ext Tobie Langel" <tobie@fb.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: Philippe Le H├ęgaret <plh@w3.org>, "Mike Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Doug Schepers" <doug@w3.org>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@us.ibm.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@gmail.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <sicking@mozilla.com>, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>, "Chris Wilson" <cwilso@google.com>, "Jake Archibald" <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.wncyx0kiy3oazb@chaals.local>
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:32:10 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:

> BTW, another option re the scope/charter questions is that the HTMLWG is  
> simply using public-webapps list for all AppCache discussions and that  
> HTMLWG retains (exclusive) decision making rights e.g. publication  
> decisions. I can see some +/- on this approach, including it could  
> conceivably eliminate the need for WebApps to recharter ;-).

Consistent with other decisions, I think unless we are chartered to talk  
about appcache, the discussion cannot be held on the mailing list.

And that's just one of the drawbacks I can see.

cheers

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 15:36:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:59 GMT