W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [css3-images] editorial comments

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:12:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCbYGTDqqrJQaCGzQeQ8rFUSAvnz4LWbzg9PWhBdL6qXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
Cc: John Hax <johnhax@gmail.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
<kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> (Cc -www-style +www-arcive)
> Hello Tab,
>
> (12/02/09 18:36), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> I've made all of these changes.
>>
>> Please let me know if these resolutions are acceptable.
>
> I did say on IRC that I accept all the issues I raised, but...
>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
>> <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> 2. Resolution Units: the <resolution> type
>>>
>>>  # Note that due to the 1:96 fixed ratio of CSS ‘in’ to CSS
>>>  #‘px’, ‘1dppx’is equivalent to ‘96dpi’. This corresponds to
>>>  # the default resolution of images displayed in CSS: see
>>>‘image-resolution’.
>>>
>>> A friend of mime (John Hax in the Cc list) complains about this and
>>> he seems to think CSS2.1 Issue 149(px vs. pt)[1] should be
>>> resolved in favor of the pt-unit proposal (making only 'pt'
>>> physical).
>>
>> The WG resolved that issue already, and I agree with it and won't
>> revisit it for Images.  I recommend reviewing the (lengthy) thread
>> about the subject from last year, and if you still disagree, raising
>> the issue with the WG in the context of the Values & Units spec, which
>> is the current defining spec for the px unit.
>
> this issue isn't raised by me but Hax from the HTML5 Chinese IG. Also,
>
>  # Issue 18.
>  # Summary:  Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical
>  #           units, not the CSS units
>
> his comment wasn't specifically about this but a comment on physical
> units and browser support as he didn't know CSS2.1 has resolved this
> issue already.
>
> I suggest we categorize this issue as Out-Of-Scope or since it's more
> like an issue in CSS3 V&U.

That seems appropriate.  I've changed it.

> I asked him if would accept this or not but he hasn't reply me. (By the
> way, his name is "贺师俊" or "HE Shi-Jun" in romanization.

Okay.

> May I ask you to change my name on the DoC to something else? I almost
> never go by "Kenny Lu" as it's not my official name and there are
> probably too many "Kenny Lu" out there. Here is my preference in order:
>
> * 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
> * Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
> * kennyluck

Done.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 21:12:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:48 GMT