W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2012

Re: csswg/css3-animations ChangeLog,1.8,1.9 Overview.html,1.17,1.18 Overview.src.html,1.18,1.19 CSSAnimation.html,1.1,NONE

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:23:52 -0800
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-id: <D4885505-6114-4A3C-B0E3-794DCF8635D6@me.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
That sounds fine!

Simon

On Feb 15, 2012, at 10:17 AM, L. David Baron wrote:

> On Monday 2012-01-30 15:24 +0000, Simon Fraser via cvs-syncmail wrote:
>> Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-animations
>> In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv18176
>> 
>> Modified Files:
>> 	ChangeLog Overview.html Overview.src.html 
>> Removed Files:
>> 	CSSAnimation.html 
>> Log Message:
>> 2012-01-30 simon.fraser@apple.com
>> 	- Clarify behavior of missing properties in keyframes:
>> 		https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14636
>> 		https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/actions/389
> 
>> Index: Overview.src.html
> 
>> +      <p>
>> +        If property is not specified for a keyframe, or is specified but invalid, the animation of that property proceeds
>> +        as if that keyframe did not exist. Conceptually, it is as if a set of keyframes is constructed for each property
>> +        that is present in any of the keyframes, and an animation is run independently for each one.
>> +      </p>
> 
> Do you mind if I change the "for each one" at the end of this
> paragraph to "for each property" just to make it clearer?
> 
> -David
> 
> -- 
> 𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> 𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2012 18:24:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:47 GMT