W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] editorial comments on Appendix D: Intrinsic Dimensions

From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:18:32 +0800
Message-ID: <5018A008.8090501@oupeng.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
(12/08/01 2:00), fantasai wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 01:14 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
>> (Cc -www-style +www-archive)
>>
>> (12/07/31 9:17), fantasai wrote:
>>>>     # For replaced elements, the min-content and max-content sizes are
>>>>     # the same and correspond used size of the replaced element
>>>> according
>>>>     # to the ‘auto’ width and height calculations.
>>>>
>>>> s/correspond/corresponding to/ ?
>>>
>>> No, the grammar is correct here. Maybe s/same/equivalent/ would help
>>> though.
>>
>> Could you help me a bit train my English parser :p ? Is "correspond"
>> here a verb? Why is it not "correspond to"?
> 
> Huh, I thought there was a "to" there. Yes, it should be "correspond
> to". :)

Great thanks for your response! I never have any confidence in my
English (and that's why I take this off the list) and I wouldn't be very
surprised if "correspond" here were an adjective or something :p.


Cheers,
Kenny
-- 
Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 03:25:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:55 GMT