- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:18:32 +0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
(12/08/01 2:00), fantasai wrote: > On 07/31/2012 01:14 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: >> (Cc -www-style +www-archive) >> >> (12/07/31 9:17), fantasai wrote: >>>> # For replaced elements, the min-content and max-content sizes are >>>> # the same and correspond used size of the replaced element >>>> according >>>> # to the ‘auto’ width and height calculations. >>>> >>>> s/correspond/corresponding to/ ? >>> >>> No, the grammar is correct here. Maybe s/same/equivalent/ would help >>> though. >> >> Could you help me a bit train my English parser :p ? Is "correspond" >> here a verb? Why is it not "correspond to"? > > Huh, I thought there was a "to" there. Yes, it should be "correspond > to". :) Great thanks for your response! I never have any confidence in my English (and that's why I take this off the list) and I wouldn't be very surprised if "correspond" here were an adjective or something :p. Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 03:25:36 UTC