Re: FYI: redbot updates

No worries, Hiro.

The thor branch is complete; I'm going to do some more testing before merging it into master (hopefully over the next few days/ ~week).

Cheers,


On 03/09/2011, at 1:42 AM, Hirotaka Nakajima wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
> I apologize for delay. I missed for mail.
> I saw your message about thor and I have a question about it.
> 
>> I'm currently in the process of switching from nbhttp to thor (see github.com/mnot/redbot/tree/thor)
> Is it okay to deploy thor version? or it's better to deploy nbhttp version.
> 
> I will look into new redbot and change Unicorn interface.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hiro
> 
> On May 13, 2011, at 10:43 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just so you know -- I've recently been working to make redbot workable as a standalone daemon. This has necessitated some changes in the APIs that your unicorn_ui.py uses.
>> 
>> Probably the easiest way to appreciate the changes is to look at how bin/redbot has changed. E.g.,
>> - all test state is now captured in red.state (but for practical purposes, you should be able to inspect red.state as if it were the old red object)
>> - you now need to call formatter.set_red(red.state)
>> - you now call red.run with an argument that's a done callback.
>> 
>> I don't feel very confident editing the unicorn-specific code, so hopefully you'll have time to have a look. Tell me if you have any questions.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Hirotaka Nakajima
> Systems Team, W3C/Keio
> http://www.w3.org/People/Hiro/
> hiro@w3.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 00:35:18 UTC