On 2011-11-18 12:36, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-11-18 12:29, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> * Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:32:22 +0100, Julian >>> Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> >>> wrote: >>>> I recently started looking at FF's Content-Type related code. As far as >>>> I can tell, there are at least two code paths, one taken for the HTTP >>>> header field, one for HTML media type attributes. There may be more. >>>> >>>> The HTTP code definitively only processes the charset parameter. >>> >>> If Gecko does that for Workers, that would be a bug. Workers are UTF-8 >>> only. >> >> If you are saying that >> >> Content-Type: application/javascript;charset=iso-8859-1 >> >> ... 0xC3 0xB6 ... >> >> should have U+00C3 U+00B6 when used via<script> and an U+00F6 when used >> via `new Worker` then I will stand ready to roll over the floor laughing >> when Firefox and Chrome are changed so they conform to this bizarre idea >> instead of doing the right thing and treating the two cases the same. > > +1 > > The only alternative would be to *reject* the script. > ... But it seems that this is what <http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/#importing-scripts-and-libraries> says. Please consider this a bug report. Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 18 November 2011 11:53:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:41 GMT