- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel@glazman.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:53:29 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- CC: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Le 08/11/11 21:32, Karl Dubost a écrit : > Daniel, > > Le 8 nov. 2011 à 15:24, Daniel Glazman a écrit : >> Some of the comments are awfully misinformed, some are interesting. > > > please, please, share :) See the comments on my blog entry. Your own proposals are just ok as proposals from my perspective. Now, the browser vendors have their word... (unfortunately) The only thing I know is the following one : what happened with -*-border-radius was lame and we decided to implement new processes to avoid a fiasco of same magnitude. Then CSS Gradients arrived and browser vendors did the very same mistake. I think it's good to have the TAG in the loop here. Feedback #1 from Web Agencies at this time is the pain it is to deal with multiple prefixed versions of the same property... </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 20:54:08 UTC