W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Feedback on ISSUE-27 poll feedback, Re: ISSUE-27: rel-ownership - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:07:33 -0400
Message-ID: <4D94DF05.1090506@intertwingly.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On 03/28/2011 09:55 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 28.03.2011 15:49, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 03/28/2011 09:18 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> On 28.03.2011 14:56, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>> On 03/28/2011 08:44 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>>> PS: chairs, please consider this feedback when deciding on ISSUE-27.
>>>> The poll is still open. Please take this opportunity to update your
>>>> responses as you see fit. Feel free to include a link to your email in
>>>> your response.

Reminder: poll closes in ~32 hours.  Please make sure that your feedback 
is complete.

> I note this WG has an issue tracker that tracks mailing list discussions
> when labeled properly. We should take advantage of that.

I'm sorry, but I will not accept as a process "go take a look at three 
hundred emails, infer whatever you can as to what the objections are, 
and make a decision based on that".

We provide ample opportunity for discussion, we expect people to pull 
all of the relevant aspects of this discussion into Change Proposals. 
Said proposals routinely contain counter arguments to other proposals.

And then we provide an opportunity for objections to be expressed.  Said 
objections routinely contain counter-arguments to objections expressed 
by others.

> Best regards, Julian

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 20:08:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:45 UTC