W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2011

Re: lack of consensus in HTML WG decisions

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:33:53 -0400
Message-ID: <4DF8ED01.7040907@intertwingly.net>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 06/15/2011 12:48 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> Bijan Parsia has commented on my recent post that
>
> "the current HTMLWG has made these decisions based on consensus is
> pretty easy to show false"
>
> I asked him to elucidate and he did
> http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2011/06/html5-accessibility-chops-conflicting-advice-and-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-14653
>
> I can understand if you are not interested in commenting on this, but
> would be interested to hear your thoughts

We have forks over items over which there was no objections:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0000.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0132.html

> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 17:34:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:36 GMT