W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2011

Re: new information & the re-opening of issues in the HTML WG

From: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:54:05 -0800
To: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <m28vx5rtdu.fsf@il0301e-dhcp240.apple.com>
Hi Paul,

You wrote:

>> I think you may have misinterpreted my question.
>
> Sorry if my response was off base.

No problem.

>> I was asking the chairs about the mechanism you intend to use, and
>> offering a suggested metric that you could take into account when
>> making such decisions.
>
> In my experience as a W3C Chair I personally use the kind of model you
> are suggesting[…snip…] But as the WG gets further and further thru the
> W3C Process in my view the "new information" needs to be more and more
> compelling before I would be willing to revisit a question.

Thanks, I think you've addressed my concern completely.


Ted

-- 
Edward O'Connor
eoconnor@apple.com
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 21:54:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:34 GMT