W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 04:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, www-archive@w3.org, public-rdfa@w3.org, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <1074238003.1573.1302607205819.JavaMail.root@cm-mail03.mozilla.org>
Danny Ayers wrote:
> On 11 April 2011 08:29, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:13 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >> Absolutely. If Facebook doesn't do it right, let's raise bug
> >> reports.
> >
> > Considering that the usual name droppees (Facebook, Yahoo! and
> > Google)
> > all failed to get it right, I suggest raising the bugs on RDFa
> > itself
> > for poor implementability.
> 
> Did Yahoo! get it wrong? I'd be surprised, they've got a good history
> in this area.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Mar/0100.html

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 11:20:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:35 GMT