W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:03:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4D9F3FE3.4000303@gmx.de>
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Taking this offlist as the chairs apparently don't want further 
discussion...

On 08.04.2011 18:43, David Carlisle wrote:
> ...
> The syntax rules for HTML (might be) a bit more flexible so perhaps
> there would be more flexibility in an html context (but perhaps not,
> real life constrains html design perhaps more than SGML heritage
> constrains XML design, as you know). So while it may be true that the
> original motivation for prefixes doesn't apply to html, that wouldn't be
> related to machine generated content.
> ...

The context was RDFa-in-HTML, which uses QNames^h^h^h^h^h^hCURIEs in 
attribute values, so compatibility with the HTML name syntax wouldn't be 
an issue.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 17:04:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:35 GMT