Taking this offlist as the chairs apparently don't want further discussion... On 08.04.2011 18:43, David Carlisle wrote: > ... > The syntax rules for HTML (might be) a bit more flexible so perhaps > there would be more flexibility in an html context (but perhaps not, > real life constrains html design perhaps more than SGML heritage > constrains XML design, as you know). So while it may be true that the > original motivation for prefixes doesn't apply to html, that wouldn't be > related to machine generated content. > ... The context was RDFa-in-HTML, which uses QNames^h^h^h^h^h^hCURIEs in attribute values, so compatibility with the HTML name syntax wouldn't be an issue. Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 8 April 2011 17:04:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:35 GMT