- From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 07:02:51 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
<snip> >> I think it's essential to think this through completely, not to rush it. > > +1, +1 > > Just a (probably redundant) fyi: AtomPub covers similar ground, a lot > of the considerations there will be relevant here - > > http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/rfc5023.html#edit-via-PUT > </snip> This reminds me that one possible way to support PUT/DELETE would be to only support it when the response representation contains a single HTML.FORM and the etag for that representation corresponds to the target resource of the HTML.FORM. IOW, adopt AtomPub's pattern of using the response representation meta-data rather than supporting direct manipulation of if-match/if-none-match from the markup. I'll note this in the doc, too. Thanks. mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me #RESTFest 2010 http://rest-fest.googlecode.com On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 06:51, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: >>> [1] http://amundsen.com/examples/put-delete-forms/ >>> ... >> >> Mike, >> >> thanks for getting this started. >> >> I think it's essential to think this through completely, not to rush it. > > +1, +1 > > Just a (probably redundant) fyi: AtomPub covers similar ground, a lot > of the considerations there will be relevant here - > > http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/rfc5023.html#edit-via-PUT > > -- > http://danny.ayers.name >
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 11:06:20 UTC