W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code]

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:24:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4D96347B.7090006@intertwingly.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: nathan@webr3.org, public-html-comments@w3.org, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, mike amundsen <mca@amundsen.com>
On 04/01/2011 03:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 01.04.2011 21:04, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 04/01/2011 02:01 PM, Nathan wrote:
>>> fwd'ing to some relevant lists - would be very happy to see a proper
>>> response from W3C / HTML WG chairs, particularly the question "And
>>> *where* should this activity happen?"
>>
>> Where is in bug reports:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>>
>> Should you (or anyone) wish to escalate a proposed RESOLUTION by the
>> editor, you will be encouraged to join the working group and participate
>> by creating a proposal and participating in the discussion:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/#join
>>
>>> best, nathan
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>
> I'm currently interested in a discussion that leads to something that
> *could* be added to the HTML spec, and might lead to clarifications in
> the HTTPbis specs.
>
> I don't think an issue tracker is the right place for that.

In that case, discussions can happen anywhere; but those that could lead 
to changes to the W3C HTML spec should occur on public-html to ensure 
that all of the right people see it.

> Best regards, Julian

- Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 20:24:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:35 GMT