- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:24:27 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: nathan@webr3.org, public-html-comments@w3.org, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, mike amundsen <mca@amundsen.com>
On 04/01/2011 03:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 01.04.2011 21:04, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On 04/01/2011 02:01 PM, Nathan wrote: >>> fwd'ing to some relevant lists - would be very happy to see a proper >>> response from W3C / HTML WG chairs, particularly the question "And >>> *where* should this activity happen?" >> >> Where is in bug reports: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html >> >> Should you (or anyone) wish to escalate a proposed RESOLUTION by the >> editor, you will be encouraged to join the working group and participate >> by creating a proposal and participating in the discussion: >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/#join >> >>> best, nathan >> >> - Sam Ruby > > I'm currently interested in a discussion that leads to something that > *could* be added to the HTML spec, and might lead to clarifications in > the HTTPbis specs. > > I don't think an issue tracker is the right place for that. In that case, discussions can happen anywhere; but those that could lead to changes to the W3C HTML spec should occur on public-html to ensure that all of the right people see it. > Best regards, Julian - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 20:24:53 UTC