- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:02:16 -0400
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 04/01/2011 11:49 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> At this point we only have objections to the "No Poster Alt" Change >> Proposal, so we turn to examine objections to the "Introduce a new >> <firstframe> element" to see if we find a stronger one. Each of the >> following are quotes from the survey: >> >> Given that sighted users won't know (or, if they do, care) that >> they're looking at the poster image, it would be confusing and >> inconsistent to have a short text alternative specifically for the >> poster image for non-sighted users. >> >> This is an opinion. Given that there was a concrete counter-example >> presented, this opinion was not given much weight. >> >> . . . > > This is a minor point, but in the future, could the chairs please > indent quotes by more than one space? It's hard to tell apart the > quotes from what the chairs are saying, especially multi-paragraph > quotes. Four spaces' indentation should be safe, but two should be a > bare minimum. The text that you quoted was indented by three spaces: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0690.html - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 16:02:45 UTC