W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Working Group Decision on 142 poster-alt

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:02:16 -0400
Message-ID: <4D95F708.1090401@intertwingly.net>
To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
CC: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 04/01/2011 11:49 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net>  wrote:
>> At this point we only have objections to the "No Poster Alt" Change
>> Proposal, so we turn to examine objections to the "Introduce a new
>> <firstframe>  element" to see if we find a stronger one.  Each of the
>> following are quotes from the survey:
>>   Given that sighted users won't know (or, if they do, care) that
>>   they're looking at the poster image, it would be confusing and
>>   inconsistent to have a short text alternative specifically for the
>>   poster image for non-sighted users.
>> This is an opinion.  Given that there was a concrete counter-example
>> presented, this opinion was not given much weight.
>> . . .
> This is a minor point, but in the future, could the chairs please
> indent quotes by more than one space?  It's hard to tell apart the
> quotes from what the chairs are saying, especially multi-paragraph
> quotes.  Four spaces' indentation should be safe, but two should be a
> bare minimum.

The text that you quoted was indented by three spaces:


- Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 16:02:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:45 UTC