W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > July 2010

Re: [Zorba-coders] Re: Zorba 1.4.0 XQuery/XQueryX Test Suite Results

From: Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:55:16 -0400
To: Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@mac.com>
Cc: Marian Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org, zorba-coders <zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <OF5F6286E1.76CE41DC-ON8525776F.00552665-8525776F.005774D7@us.ibm.com>
The constraint is across the result document and the catalog, and so it is 
not part of the schema.

I'm not sure whether it is covered in the test suite documentation ... it 
is part of the sample result file that we provide.

It would be helpful if you can provide this information. Once in a while 
the WG considers what is "common practice" and we can use this information 
as one of our data points.

Thanks.

                                        -- Andrew

--------------------
Andrew Eisenberg
IBM
5 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA  01886

andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-399-5158





From:
Daniela Florescu <dflorescu@mac.com>
To:
Andrew Eisenberg/Concord/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:
Marian Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org, zorba-coders 
<zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch>
Date:
07/29/2010 12:59 AM
Subject:
Re: [Zorba-coders] Re: Zorba 1.4.0 XQuery/XQueryX Test Suite Results



Andrew,

is this constraint part of the test result schema or is just a nice to 
have (the same string for features) ?

If it is nice to have, it should be well documented, and we'll follow.

We did it because maybe we didn't understand well the requirements.

We'll send a new result tomorrow.

Best
Dana

On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:31 PM, Andrew Eisenberg wrote:


Thanks, I've updated the reports with your results. 

A couple of requests for the future: 

You reported, in part: 

    <implementation-defined-items>
     <implementation-defined-item name="The revalidation modes that are 
supported by this implementation." value="lax, skip, strict"/>
     <implementation-defined-item name="The default revalidation mode for 
this implementation." value="lax"/>
   </implementation-defined-items>
   <features>
     <feature name="Minimum Conformance" supported="true"/>
     <feature name="Schema Import Feature" supported="true"/>
     <feature name="Schema Validation Feature" supported="true"/>
     <feature name="Static Typing Feature" supported="false"/>
     <feature name="Full Axis Feature" supported="true"/>
     <feature name="Module Feature" supported="true"/>
     <feature name="Serialization Feature" supported="true"/>
   </features> 

The feature names and implementation-defined item names should match those 
in the catalog. In the catalog we have "Schema Import", not "Schema Import 
Feature", for example. 

If you would, please report a more complete list of implementation-defined 
items. 

Thanks. 

                                       -- Andrew

--------------------
Andrew Eisenberg
IBM
5 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA  01886

andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-399-5158




From: 
Marian Sorin Nasoi <spungi@gmail.com> 
To: 
Andrew Eisenberg/Concord/IBM@IBMUS 
Cc: 
www-archive@w3.org, zorba-coders <zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch> 
Date: 
07/28/2010 11:59 AM 
Subject: 
Zorba 1.4.0 XQuery/XQueryX Test Suite Results




Hi Andrew,

please find attached the XQuery and XQueryX test suite results
for Zorba 1.4.0 (http://www.zorba-xquery.com/). The results are
based on the XQTS_current.zip as of March 23, 2010.

This is a summary of the results:
XQuery: 19161/19426
XQueryX: 18371/18830

Please let me know if you have any problems with this submission.

Thanks for the help.

Best regards,
Sorin
[attachment "Zorba1.4.0_XQuery(X)_results.zip" deleted by Andrew 
Eisenberg/Concord/IBM] 

_______________________________________________
Zorba-coders mailing list
Zorba-coders@lists.inf.ethz.ch
https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/zorba-coders
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 15:55:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:31 GMT