W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > January 2010

(unknown charset) RE: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request

From: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:31:58 +0100
To: (unknown charset) Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: (unknown charset) Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100118203158698179.0c3f1b2b@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Larry Masinter, Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:37:37 -0800:

[...]

> It might help to use "this specification" rather than
> "this document" to avoid overloading "document".
> 
> The rules of this specification apply to documents and
> also to processors.

+1   A purely editorial improvement. Although "this document" is 
described as "this specification" in the previous sentence.

> * They apply to documents meeting the requirements
>   of HTML4, HTML5 and XHTML for documents.
> * They apply to processors meeting the requirements
>   of HTML5 for parsing rules.
>
> Do I have that right? 

I think the Abstract section of the draft first has a sentence about 
where its /syntax/ is valid: "in the HTML5 and XHTML5 members of the 
HTML family". Then it talks about where the /interpretation/ (aka 
parsing rules) will apply. So in a way it has this already. Except for 
the detail that I took up below, and which Manu has already agreed to.

> -----Original Message-----
> On Behalf Of Leif Halvard Silli
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:41 PM
>
> Manu Sporny, Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:53:58 -0500:
> 
>> Feedback on the current draft would be appreciated:
>> 
>> http://html5.digitalbazaar.com/specs/rdfa.html
> 
> In another thread I commented the following part of HTML+RDFa:
> 
> ]]The rules defined in this document not only apply to HTML5 documents 
> in non-XML and XML mode, but also to HTML4 documents interpreted 
> through the HTML5 parsing rules.[[
> 
> My question/suggestion: Shouldn't that sentence also say that HTML+RDFa 
> not only applies to HTML4 but also to XHTML documents when "interpreted 
> through the HTML5 parsing rules"?
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 19:32:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:28 GMT