W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2010

Timeline of PFWG comment-response on css3-background

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:58:41 -0800
Message-ID: <4D0029C1.8070002@inkedblade.net>
To: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Copied from the CSSWG list for public record.

2009-10-15 - LCWD published
              http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-background-20091015/
2009-11-17 - LC comment deadline
2009-11-27 - last update to DoC
              http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/css3-background/issues-lc-2009
2009-12-17 - CR published
              http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-css3-background-20091217/

2010-01-06 - PFWG comment
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0109.html
2010-01-06 - Tab responds to PFWG
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0112.html
2010-01-20 - Daniel confirms that Tab's response is CSSWG's official position
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/wai-liaison/2010Jan/0006.html
2010-02-24 - PFWG responds to Tab
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0228.html
2010-02-24 - fantasai responds to PFWG, solicits more information
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0229.html
PFWG does not respond

2010-06-23 - return to LCWD
              http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-css3-background-20100612/
2010-07-06 - LC comment deadline
2010-10-21 - last update to DoC
              http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/csswg/css3-background/issues-lc-2010.txt?rev=1.4&content-type=text/plain
2010-10-27 - PFWG comment
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html
2010-10-27 - fantasai responds, asks whether edits+answers are satisfactory
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html
PFWG does not respond
2010-11-24 - CSSWG resolution to publish (4 weeks later)

Summary:

   1. PFWG's first comment was responded to promptly. It was not recorded
      in the first DoC due to submission after CR was published.
   2. The first comment was not recorded in the second DoC either because I
      had attempted to address all open issues before publishing LC, and
      therefore did not list any comments prior to the LC publication date
      when compiling the DoC.
   2. PFWG's second comment was addressed prompty, but was not recorded in
      the LC issues list due to my oversight.
   3. PFWG did not acknowledge any of my responses or respond to any
      questions therein.

~fantasai
Editor, CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders Module
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 00:59:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:33 GMT