Re: Removal of other semantic elements

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> Um, what?  It was a simple request.  I even put a smilie at the end to
> make sure the correct intention, that of a helpful correction, was
> sent over the wire.
>
> Chill, Shelley.

That it's seemingly OK for Doug to cc the list, but was not OK for me
to reply to his email, and also include the list, was rude.

That you termed my email "polluting" when it was focused on relevant
topic material, but considered Doug's email was OK, was also rude.

That you would instruct me to pay attention to the cc list, like I'm
some kind of newbie in this forum was rude.

And if I were to tell you where you can shove your smiley, why then my
statement would also be rude. So I won't.

Shelley

PS Notice lack of smiley

>
> ~TJ
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This was the rudest email I have received related to W3C efforts.
>>
>> You have personal problems with me. Frankly, that's your problem. If
>> you can't maintain a professional attitude with me, then don't
>> communicate with me, period.
>>
>> Shelley
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Please don't pollute the www-style list with something entirely
>>> unrelated to it.  I know that Doug was the one that originally CCed
>>> us, and that was valid.  Just pay attention to who's in the CC box.
>>> ^_^
>>>
>>> ~TJ
>>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 19:42:30 UTC