W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2009

Re: vCard RDF NOTE - draft

From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:57:19 +1000
Message-ID: <6634445D-3AA8-48D2-9B84-AC5E16E43A95@nicta.com.au>
CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Thanks Toby.

Points 1 and 2 - I will update

Point 3 - As a NOTE, the original was a cross tutorial/spec.
I am happy to leave it this way (does no harm) otherwise the NOTE is  
just an Ontology list?

Renato


On 28 Sep 2009, at 22:50, Toby Inkster wrote:

>> http://spin.nicta.org.au/vcardrdf/vcard-rdf-20090924.html
>
> A few comments:
>
> 1. The data URI in your example has a capital 'L' instead of a  
> colon. Yes,
> they're right next to each other on the keyboard!
>
> 2. When I recommended using data: URIs, what I meant was not:
>
>    <vCard:photo>
>        ....
>    </vCard:photo>
>
> but rather:
>
>    <vCard:photo rdf:resource="...." />
>
> That way, a consuming application can always rely on the value of
> vCard:photo being the URI of an image.
>
> 3. The note includes a bunch of explanations on how to use generic RDF
> features like rdf:parseType. Are we aiming for this to be a tutorial  
> for
> how to write RDF/XML or a vocabulary definition? If the latter, then I
> don't think we need to include explanations of syntactic features.  
> (That
> said, an accompanying tutorial might be useful too.)
>
> -Toby

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
NICTA
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 06:04:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:26 GMT