On 14 Sep 2009, at 04:58, Renato Iannella wrote: > Please comment on the changes so far - I hope they capture the > ideas so far, but I may have misread some...so please have a good > read thru.... The RDF/XML syntax in 3.2 is indeed wrong. Firstly, rdf:Lists don't use <rdf:li> (only rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq and rdf:Alt do). Secondly, rdf:parseType="Collection" doesn't work with literal values. I'm not sure why any kind of grouping structure is needed here - it unnecessarily complicates matters for both consumers and producers of data. Why not just this? <VCard> <title>Principal Scientist</title> <title>Visiting Professor</title> </VCard> Section 3.5. I'd suggest ditching the idea of inline base64 data as literals and instead using "data:" URIs. > I also could not find any nice RDF/OWL to HTML converter (yet) ;-) Tried this? http://planb.nicecupoftea.org/2009/06/06/generating-specs- from-rdfs-owl-docs/ -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 05:51:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:26 GMT