W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2009

Re: the MathML comments

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:09:24 +0100
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Web Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u24mpya564w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook.local>
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:05:44 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> -public-html
>> +www-archive
>> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:52:29 -0800, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  
>> wrote:
>>> So, on one hand, I have zero sympathy for any active participant in  
>>> the working group who chose to attend a session on MathML who may  
>>> claim to have been unaware of this work or making any statement other  
>>> than the fact that while they personally did not have a chance to  
>>> review it, sufficient others have for this to have been sent on behalf  
>>> of the working group.
>> When the session was announced I got the impression it was about MathML  
>> integration (also based on a short discussion earlier with another Math  
>> WG member) and since I know something about that I attended. I had no  
>> idea MathML feedback would be discussed.
> Did I suggest that you shouldn't have attended?

I do not think the "zero sympathy" is fair given the situation.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 12:10:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:36 UTC