- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:00:00 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, www-archive@w3.org
On 21/5/09 11:41, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:53:39 +0200, Doug Schepers<schepers@w3.org> wrote: >> FYI, typically moving a thread to www-archive gets many more people >> reading it. A post to www-archive is essentially a call for wider >> review. The public-html ML is so overwhelming that many people only >> read what leaks over into www-archive. >> >> It's fine if you intended your post to do that; I just wanted to clarify >> that it does not decrease the number of people you are "bothering". Doug, that's a crock :) Anyone fool enough to actually subscribe to www-archive gets exactly what they signed up for : anything. It just so happens that www-archive generally has more interesting content than most other W3C lists, so the gossip-hungry procrastinators amongst us enjoy the list. It's my favourite. Yours, a loyal www-archive reader who gets what he deserves, Dan > How do you measure this? > > Subscriber numbers do not really back this up: > > http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/MailingListQuery.pl?queryList=www-archive (W3C Member-only) > http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/MailingListQuery.pl?queryList=public-html (W3C Member-only) > >
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 11:00:45 UTC