W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2009

Re: vCard - Old vs. New?

From: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:58:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4A094853.4030902@yahoo-inc.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org, www-archive@w3.org
Hi All,

Unfortunately I won't be there in Heraklion, but I would encourage you 
to get together there... The difficult part seems to be 
social/organizational/political arrangement, not the technology itself.

Best,
Peter

Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 12/5/09 01:41, Renato Iannella wrote:
>>
>> Can we move forward on the idea of creating a W3C vCard/RDF Interest
>> Group Note (that merges the W3C Member submission and the "An Ontology
>> for vCards") as a task of the Semantic Web Interest Group?
>>
>> BTW, I will be at the ESWC in Heraklion in a few weeks, so maybe an
>> opportunity to discuss in detail....
>
> If others amongst you will be there, why don't you get together and 
> try to make some progress there? I suggest the Social Web XG as a 
> mechanism for tracking this effort, even if the document surfaces as a 
> SWIG Note, since SWXG meets regularly with minutes, agendas etc while 
> SWIG doesn't have that kind of a mechanism. Enough SWIG folk are 
> engaged in this discussion (now and over the years) that I don't see a 
> problem with doing the update under SWIG.
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 10:02:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 May 2009 10:02:17 GMT