W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:46:47 +0100
Message-ID: <b6bb4d890906151046x651fd7f1g1c333a36e5cd72e7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote:

> And by the way the rule does not derive from RDF and is only
> implied by a very particular reading of the HTTP and URI RFCs.

Oh, for some reason that reminds me of a Simpsons quote:

“In 1796, a fiercely determined band of pioneers leaves Maryland after
misinterpreting a passage in the bible. Their destination, New Sodom.”

> if you (Sean) think a normative statement is needed, encourage
> the TAG (or some other WG) to generate a recommendation

Very funny.

-- 
Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 17:47:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:25 GMT