W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Push processing and Web Socket Protocol

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:51:25 -0400
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF16503A79.64C12300-ON852575CF.0077B3C4-852575CF.0077C2C6@lotus.com>
Thank you.  As I said, the comment on the spec. packaging was mostly an 
aside, but I appreciate your taking the trouble to send me the details. 
Thanks!

Noah

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
06/06/2009 09:25 AM
 
        To:     noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
        cc:     Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-archive 
<www-archive@w3.org>
        Subject:        Re: Push processing and Web Socket Protocol


-tag +archive

On 5 Jun 2009, at 21:17, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:

> OK, great.  That was more or less an aside anyway; I just assumed 
> that you
> still had some hiddent meta-HTML5 source from which this was indeed
> generated (though I was intrigued that you took the trouble to do 
> that and
> have it come out as such an idiomatic IETF draft.)

There's quite a few specs contained within the "source" file in at 
least the WHATWG SVN repo (I can't remember whether this is in W3C 
CVS), primarily because they have cross-references from one another 
automatically created, and tools for doing this between multiple HTML 
files aren't very good. Most of the specs (to my knowledge with the 
sole exception of XMLHttpRequest) are generated in this way.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 21:50:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:25 GMT