- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:18:46 +0200
- To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Web Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
-public-html +www-archive On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:10:31 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Meanwhile, there exists a proposal to make summary attribute conforming. > Not mandatory or anything, simply optional: > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE/SummarySpecification > > Looking at "version a" in that proposal, the only operational > requirement I see on existing browsers is contained on the last line: > > The summary DOM attribute must reflect the summary content attribute. > > As far as I can tell, that particular requirement is both redundant and > not in dispute. I say redundant in that HTML5 specifies that all > unrecognized attributes, "vestigial" or otherwise, are to be placed in > the DOM. And I know of no existing browsers or plans to do otherwise. I think you misunderstand DOM attributes. Having said that, I doubt any browser does not support the summary DOM attribute. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 13:19:37 UTC