Re: Concerns about new section "predefined vocabularies" (ACTION-123)

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> That being said; I don't think the arguments given in these mails are 
> convincing, and I'd *really* like to see an answer to the points I 
> raised over here.

Just out of interest, have I ever convinced you of anything?

(I'm honestly curious; I could think of several cases where you've 
convinced me that I'm wrong, but I can't think of any discussions where 
I've convinced you that you're wrong.)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 09:15:28 UTC