I think the vcard2006 ontology should be out quickly and simply define the 40 % of the contact detail elements used in 95% of the cases ;-) Don't let's start a new research project or complex engineering task, but let's create a single, consensual recommendation for the basic things now Just my 2 cents. Martin Renato Iannella wrote: > > Thanks for the discussion everyone.... > > Firstly, the 2001 Note and 2006 Ontology were focussed on vCard 3.0.... > > Since vCard 4.0 is close to final...not that many changes to > go...should we simply say....leave the NOTE/Ontology as they are and > lets do the RDF for vCard 4.0 ? > > Comments? > > Cheers... Renato Iannella > NICTA > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp@computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp twitter: mfhepp Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! ================================================================= Webcast: http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Recipe for Yahoo SearcMonkey: http://tr.im/rAbN Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: "Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology" http://tinyurl.com/semtech-hepp Overview article on Semantic Universe: http://tinyurl.com/goodrelations-universe Project page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Resources for developers: http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations Tutorial materials: CEC'09 2009 Tutorial: The Web of Data for E-Commerce: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://tr.im/grcec09Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 10:39:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:25 GMT