Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal

-cc public-html; +cc www-archive, rather than
bothering ~400 people with a "+1"...

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 17:01 +0100, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
[...]
> I suggest simply marking it with a big-issue note stating that the 
> section is intended to be removed pending its inclusion in an 
> alternative spec.

Yes, I like that idea; please do that, Ian.

While you're at it, feel free to note the 2 possibilities
Henri outlined in his message of Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:33:27 +0200.

>   There is precedent for this in a few places already.
> 
> e.g. Section 2.2.3, Common conformance requirements for APIs exposed to 
> JavaScript, includes a big-issue note stating:
> 
>    ** This section will eventually be removed in favour of WebIDL. **
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E