W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2009

Re: NFC FAQ

From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:00:48 -0800
Message-ID: <30b660a20902201800n6a5a877bnb1402728b2579fc7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Fixed, thanks.

Mark


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:47, Geoffrey Sneddon
<foolistbar@googlemail.com>wrote:

> -: All to/cc, +: www-archive
>
>
> On 17 Feb 2009, at 23:07, Mark Davis wrote:
>
>  I put together a short FAQ on NFC, including some figures on performance
>> and
>> frequencies.
>>
>> http://www.macchiato.com/unicode/nfc-faq
>>
>
> Under "Parsing tokens is very performance-sensitive; won't normalizing be
> too costly?" you talk of < U+0300 being unaffected, before talking in the
> included strategy of > U+00FF — is this a mistake, or why is this
> inconsistency here?
>
>
> --
> Geoffrey Sneddon
> <http://gsnedders.com/>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 02:01:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:21 GMT