Fixed, thanks. Mark On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:47, Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>wrote: > -: All to/cc, +: www-archive > > > On 17 Feb 2009, at 23:07, Mark Davis wrote: > > I put together a short FAQ on NFC, including some figures on performance >> and >> frequencies. >> >> http://www.macchiato.com/unicode/nfc-faq >> > > Under "Parsing tokens is very performance-sensitive; won't normalizing be > too costly?" you talk of < U+0300 being unaffected, before talking in the > included strategy of > U+00FF — is this a mistake, or why is this > inconsistency here? > > > -- > Geoffrey Sneddon > <http://gsnedders.com/> > >Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 02:01:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 21 February 2009 02:01:27 GMT