Re: UniMsg: editorial

Tyler Close wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you for reviewing the Uniform Messaging document.
Sure thing...
> I suspect all of the above is familiar to you and that you were
> tripped up by the use of the word "permission", instead of "secret
> token" or similar.
Partly; I'm genuinely new to some of this stuff; but in that way, 
perhaps I'm representative of part of your audience.

Thanks for the explanation.

-- 
Dan

Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 13:46:47 UTC