W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2009

Re: vCard RDF merge....

From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:47:07 +1000
CC: <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FF71C3DF-D8A9-4302-95D5-C3F56ABC8400@nicta.com.au>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Does anyone have any more views on the current situation?

I don't want to delay any current work progress.....and if the answer  
is, let them just use the Ontology, then lets...

(I also plan to look at vCard 4.0 to do an closer RDF mapping to  
it....but that is later work...)


On 7 Aug 2009, at 22:24, Renato Iannella wrote:

> Martin, I started to put the two together:
>  http://spin.nicta.org.au/vcardrdf/vcard-rdf-2009.html
> That's when I send the email asking some questions:
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Jun/0146.html
> I'm really stuck on the structure for multiple property values which  
> vCard supports.
> Which is what is in the NOTE, but not in the Ontology, and mentioned  
> here:
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Jun/0147.html
> I suppose if you are after just the ontology - and not a "faithful"  
> mapping of the vCard semantics - then it would be easiest to just  
> use the current ontology:
>  http://developer.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/smguide/vcard-details.html
> Cheers...  Renato Iannella

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 23:55:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:43:34 UTC