Re: Spelling changes

L. David Baron wrote:
> On Monday 2009-06-08 11:30 -0700, fantasai wrote:
>> Looks good, however, ince "acknowledgement" /is/ an acceptable US spelling*
>> (even if the spellchecker prefers "acknowledgment") I would prefer to keep
>> that. Mostly because I think "acknowledgment" is an inane variant that
>> violates both phonetic and morphemic orthography, but also because then
>> it still matches the anchor. :)
> 
> Except for that one, I was only changing the spelling in the Changes
> section to match the actual spec (which uses the spelling that my
> spellchecker prefers, except for the name of the named anchor, which
> I left).
> 
> Bert, is it ok to commit these?  (Current patch attached.)

Looks good.

Some of the files have changed today, be sure to do a cvs update before
the commit.



Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 20:57:12 UTC