W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Review Comments for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:53:00 +0100
Message-ID: <b6bb4d890904170853x79ce12fbu61ed4ae9d8495c1f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> “[...] Although the URI MAY point to a resource that contains a
> definition of the semantics of the relation type, clients SHOULD
> NOT access that resource to avoid overburdening its server."

Does that mean that RDF users would routinely be able to check whether
a 303 is returned, or does it not? If the former, then the SHOULD NOT
injunction doesn't serve its purpose. If not, then there is a
compatibility problem with RDF.

Kindest regards,

-- 
Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 15:53:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:21 GMT