On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:52:12 +0100, Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz> wrote: > I have nothing at all against Mike being "pro-active" and putting some > thing together and publishing it, it's only the fact that it's been > published at, and endorsed by the W3C that bothers me, it's pretty hard > to argue against such a spec when it has already been published and > people have accepted that it's here for good. I explained this in detail > but I don't think you listen. In what way has it been published and endorsed by the W3C? It certainly does not look to be published and endorsed more than say when I first drafted the html5-diff document, on which the HTML WG had not made any decisions at that time either. (I'm not sure I agree with that the document should define things in a normative way, but I have a hard time seeing how anything Mike did here is wrong.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 10:45:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 November 2008 10:45:49 GMT