W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2008

RE: <scene> (and other advanced proposals)

From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:48:42 -0700
To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D12127075745E648BBC075EF46983E170C4370245E@TK5-EXMBX-W603v.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

I'd be fine if they want to have discussion on www-html; I do like the wiki (or other similar permanent, structured storage) idea for collecting "HTML6 brainstorming".

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael(tm) Smith [mailto:mike@w3.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:15 AM
To: Chris Wilson
Cc: Dan Connolly; www-archive
Subject: Re: <scene> (and other advanced proposals)

Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, 2008-06-18 10:54 -0700:

> I'm looking for some way for people with ideas like Dmitry's to
> feel that we're not simply saying "go away," but instead that
> their ideas will come up for consideration at an appropriate
> time.

I agree that we should try to have a place where anybody has the
opportunity to contribute ideas for HTML that they have to offer,
no matter how far-fetched or unlikely to make it into this rev of
the language. There's some value to brainstorming or noodling
about "what if" ideas -- even ideas that clearly don't seem likely
at all to get support from browser vendors any time soon or from
other stakeholders in the community and that nobody else has shown
much enthusiasm for yet.

I don't think that everybody e-mailing all 350+ members for the
HTML WG public-html every time they have a "what if" idea is what
any of us would ideally like to happen.

To help facilitate discussion of those kinds of ideas among people
who want to discuss them, maybe we can can get volunteers in the
group to consider setting up and maintaining some alternative
means for enabling discussion of them (alternative to having them
got straight out to public-html first).

What would be the best means for doing that, I'm not sure. The
Wiki does seem like one possibly appropriate place. A separate
mailing list that people can opt-in to is another -- though I
recognize that we already have a lot of mailing lists for the
group. Maybe www-html would be appropriate?

  --Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:51 AM
> To: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Michael(tm) Smith; www-archive
> Subject: RE: <scene> (and other advanced proposals)
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 10:23 -0700, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > -Dmitry
> >
> > Great response.  Hey, what would you think of keeping a wiki with ideas for the next time we recharter?
>
> I don't mind if Somebody does that, but I'm not likely
> to push it, groom it, etc.
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>

--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2008 20:49:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 November 2012 14:18:18 GMT